Herron Fuels Reduction Project
Proposed Action Unit Treatment Descriptions
|
Unit No. |
Current Conditions |
Current Problem |
Proposed Treatment and Rationale |
Desired Conditions after Treatment |
Comments / Caveats |
|
1 (whipfall, underburn) |
á Natural, open, grassy meadow with
widely-spaced ponderosa pine(PP).
á Dry site. Thin soil. Will never make a good tree-growing
area. á Southerly exposure. á Lack of disturbance has allowed
Douglas-Fir(DF) seedlings and saplings to encroach into the north and east
edges of the meadow. á Timber litter and brush accumulating under
trees. |
á Brush and tree litter is accumulating
under some trees, potentially increasing ladder fuels and flame lengths
during fire. á Fir regeneration reduces chance of pine
regeneration. Pine is more
suited for dry sites than fir, and is more fire resistant. |
á Whipfall trees <6Ó encroaching into north and east sides
of meadow to reduce ladder fuels under leave trees and reduce meadow
encroachment. á Rake needle litter 30" away from
leave trees >10 Ò DBH to reduce chance of root damage and cat-facing. á Underburn to remove surface fuels, kill
brush, and heat-prune lowest limbs. |
á Ponderosa pine grassland
free of fir seedlings and saplings. Some Ponderosa seedlings occur to replace
dying overstory. á Reduced surface fuels around leave trees. á Open, park-like stand structure. á Resultant stands will be resistant to
wildfire. Wildfire will stay on
the ground and have little effect on tree crowns. |
|
|
2, 4, 7 (harvest, underburn) |
á Stand is predominated by older overstory
pine. á Fir regeneration is filling in stand. á Timber litter and brush accumulating under
trees. á Past overstory removal in unit 2,4. none in 7. á Lots of mistletoe in unit 7. |
á Ingrowth of young Fir seedlings and
saplings is hampering regeneration of pine. Stand is slowly converting to a
less fire-resilient stand that is not sustainable. Is susceptible to insect and disease outbreaks as well as
high mortality from wildfire. á Abundance of ladder fuels (brush,
saplings) causing threat of torching and crown fire. High potential of stand-replacing
fire. á Lots of mistletoe in unit 7. |
á Use conventional, ground-based harvesting to thin stand, leaving the
largest and best trees with average spacing 20'-26', favoring fire-resistant
pine and larch. á Whipfall fir <6Ó to reduce ladder fuels
and future overstocking. á Rake needle litter 30" away from
leave trees within 200' of roads and forest boundary to reduce chance of
large trees burning and falling onto roads or across fences. á Pullback slash 6' from around leave trees
to reduce chance of excess heat and scorch height around leave trees. á Underburn to remove surface fuels, kill
brush, and heat-prune lowest limbs. |
á Development of receptive seed bed for
better pine regeneration. á Reduced surface fuels around leave trees
for less chance of intense wildfire with long flame lengths. á Few ladder fuels under or around leave
trees to lessen chance of torching or crown fire. á Open, park-like stand structure with clear
spacing between crowns that will
resist fire mortality and crown fire. |
á Treatment of unit 7 will depend upon
successful negotiation of access through old logging road on adjacent private
property. |
|
5 (harvest, grapple pile) |
á Stand is predominated by larger fir and
larch. Thick. á Has a few large pine on south aspects. á Lots of mistletoe and bug-killed fir and
larch. á Fir regeneration is filling in stand. á Very thick ninebark á Never been logged. |
á Ingrowth of young Fir seedlings and
saplings is hampering regeneration of pine. Stand is slowly converting to a
less fire-resilient stand that is not sustainable. Is susceptible to insect and disease outbreaks as well as
high mortality from wildfire. á Abundance of ladder fuels (brush,
saplings) causing threat of torching and crown fire. High potential of stand-replacing
fire. |
á Use conventional, ground-based harvesting to thin stand, leaving the
largest and best trees with average spacing 20'-26', favoring fire-resistant
pine and larch. á Whipfall fir <6Ó to insure ladder fuels
will be reduced, and to reduce future overstocking. á Pile slash as it is created with machine
"grapple" methods.
This will allow disposal in confined area between riparian and forest
boundary. á Burn piles in fall when danger of wildfire
is minimal. |
á Development of receptive seed bed for
better pine and larch regeneration. á Reduced surface fuels around leave trees
for less chance of intense wildfire with long flamelengths. á Few ladder fuels under or around leave
trees to lessen chance of torching or crown fire. á |
á Treatment will depend upon successful
negotiation of access through old logging road on adjacent private property. |
|
9, 12, 13, 14, 16, 32 (harvest, grapple pile) |
á These stands were heavily logged in the
early 1960s. á Stands were planted and thinned, mainly
with fir. Even though trees were
thinned 10-20 years ago, additional seedlings and saplings are filling in the
stand. á Predominant species is fir with a little
larch. |
á Young fir seedling and sapling
regeneration is coming in thick, providing ladder fuels and dense future
canopy. Abundance of
ladder fuels (brush, saplings) causing threat of torching and crown
fire. High potential of
stand-replacing fire. |
á Use ground-based harvesting equipment to
thin trees, seedling and larger, leaving the largest and best trees
>7" dbh with average spacing 18' - 24'. á As harvester proceeds, accumulate limbs
and tops into small piles suitable for jackpot burning. á Burn slash piles either by pile burning or
jackpot burning. |
á Stand of reproduction will be thinned to a
spacing adequate for growth without dense intermingling of canopy. á Natural reproduction will be removed to
lessen ladder fuels and crowding. á Surface fuels created by the thinning will
be eliminated. |
á The small amount of commercial wood may
not offset the costs of thinning and piling. |
|
10, 11, 23, 31, 37 (precommecial thin, handpile) |
á This unit as been
previously treated in a seedtree harvest followed by a PCT. Overstory PP and DF are in good
condition. á Understory has grown in
densely with a clumpy distribution averaging 350 tpa (this is too dense for a
dry DF site). á Stands were planted and
thinned. Additional seedlings and saplings are filling in the stand. á Predominant species is
fir with a little larch. |
á Young fir seedling and sapling
regeneration is coming in thick, providing ladder fuels and dense future
canopy. á Abundance of ladder fuels (brush,
saplings) causing threat of torching and crown fire. High potential of stand-replacing
fire. á Stands occur adjacent to private lands or
on slopes that are too steep for machinery. |
á Precommercial thin with manual labor with
chainsaws. Reduce understory
stocking to approximately 170 tpa, leaving PP when possible (approx. 16 foot
spacing of US). Distribution
will remain somewhat clumpy. á Hand pile activity slash. Burn
handpiles. Prune boles to 6
feet. |
á Stand will be thinned to a spacing adequate
for growth without dense intermingling of canopy. á Natural regeneration will be removed to
lessen ladder fuels and crowding. á Surface fuels created by the thinning will
be eliminated. |
Noncommercial, no
probable salvage rights. |
|
18, 30 (harvest, grapple pile) |
á Unit 18 and 30 are located in a large
stand that was logged down to commercial size (9Ó), then the US was
precommercially thinned to 10x10. á Stand is composed of DF with some WL, PP
in OS, mainly DF in US á Distribution is extremely clumpy. á Dry grassland/pp site |
á Past harvest favored removal of fire tolerant WL and PP. á Understory is composed mainly of fire
intolerant DF with some PP, WL..
á A greater componant of WL and PP would
make the stand more survivable after wildfire. |
á Use ground-based harvesting equipment to
thin trees, seedling and larger, leaving the largest and best trees with
average spacing 18' - 24'. á As harvester proceeds, accumulate limbs
and tops into small piles suitable for jackpot burning. á Burn slash piles either by pile burning or
jackpot burning. |
á Stand of reproduction will be thinned to a
spacing adequate for growth without dense intermingling of canopy. á Interstitial reproduction will be removed
to lessen ladder fuels and crowding. á Surface fuels created by the thinning will
be eliminated. á Improve species mix to a higher proportion
of fire tolerant WL and PP. |
Most of area is
noncommercial may be salvage right opp. |
|
3, 6, 19, 20, 33, 36 (whipfall, underburn) |
á These stands have widely spaced, fire
resistance overstory trees that are being filled in with excessive fir
understory trees and brush. á Large overstory leave trees have good fire
resistance. á Most of these stands are on steep ground
or rocky areas making for poor accessibility. |
á Brush and tree litter is accumulating,
increasing ladder fuels and flamelengths during fire. á Fir regeneration reduces chance of pine
regeneration. Pine is more
suited for dry sites than fir, and is more fire resistant. á Ingrowth of young Fir seedlings and
saplings is hampering regeneration of pine. Stands are slowly converting to
less fire-resilient stands that are not sustainable. Is susceptible to insect and disease
outbreaks as well as high mortality from wildfire. á Abundance of ladder fuels (brush,
saplings) causing threat of torching and crown fire. Increasing potential of
stand-replacing fire. á |
á Whipfall fir <6Ó to insure ladder fuels
will be reduced, and to reduce future overstocking. á Underburn to remove surface fuels, kill
brush and unwanted seedlings, and heat-prune lowest limbs. |
á Development of receptive seed bed for
better pine regeneration. á Reduced surface fuels around leave trees
for less chance of intense wildfire with long flamelengths. á Few ladder fuels under or around leave
trees to lessen chance of torching or crown fire. á Open, park-like stand structure with clear
spacing between crowns that will
resist fire mortality and crown fire. |
|
|
38 (harvest, underburn) |
á This stand was heavily logged in the early
1960s. á Stands were planted and thinned, mainly
with fir. Even though trees were
thinned 10-20 years ago, additional seedlings and saplings are filling in the
stand. á Predominant species is fir with a little
larch. |
á Young fir seedling and sapling
regeneration is coming in thick, providing ladder fuels and dense future
canopy. Abundance of ladder
fuels (brush, saplings) causing threat of torching and crown fire. High potential of stand-replacing
fire. |
á Use conventional, ground-based harvesting to thin stand, leaving the
largest and best trees with average spacing 20'-26', favoring fire-resistant
pine and larch. á Whipfall fir <6Ó to insure ladder fuels
will be reduced, and to reduce future overstocking. á Underburn to remove surface fuels, kill
brush and unwanted seedlings, and heat-prune lowest limbs. |
á Development of receptive seed bed for
better pine regeneration. á Reduced surface fuels around leave trees
for less chance of intense wildfire with long flamelengths. á Few ladder fuels under or around leave
trees to lessen chance of torching or crown fire. á Open, park-like stand structure with clear
spacing between crowns that will
resist fire mortality and crown fire. |
|
|
21, 22, 34 (harvest, underburn) |
á These stands were heavily logged in the
early 1960s. á Stands were planted and thinned, mainly
with fir. Even though trees were
thinned 10-20 years ago, additional seedlings and saplings are filling in the
stand. á Predominant species is fir with a little
larch. |
á Young fir seedling and sapling
regeneration is coming in thick, providing ladder fuels and dense future
canopy. Abundance of
ladder fuels (brush, saplings) causing threat of torching and crown
fire. High potential of
stand-replacing fire. |
á Use ground-based harvesting equipment to
thin trees, seedling and larger, leaving the largest and best trees
>7" dbh with average spacing 18' - 24'. á As harvester proceeds, accumulate limbs
and tops into small piles suitable for jackpot burning. á Burn slash piles either by pile burning or
jackpot burning. |
á Stand of reproduction will be thinned to a
spacing adequate for growth without dense intermingling of canopy. á Interstitial reproduction will be removed
to lessen ladder fuels and crowding. á Surface fuels created by the thinning will
be eliminated. |
|