Project Narrative
1. Statement of Need: The
Colville National Forest (CNF) within Stevens County, like many of the western
National Forests, contains an overabundance of small diameter evergreen trees
that are unhealthy, stunted, and over crowded. Many of these forest stands are adjacent to human
settlements. Fire suppression and
deferred maintenance (the lack of substantial pre-commercial thinning) for the
past eighty-five years have resulted in a situation of critical fire
danger. In fact, the predictions
are that massive forest fires on the scale of the 1920s in the area are past
due and could occur any year.
These hundreds of thousands of acres of overstocked stands need to be
thinned to a spacing that will reduce ladder fuels, crown density and allow for
vigorous tree growth. The problem
is that many of the trees and much of the smaller material typically left in
the woods or burned as ÒslashÓ do not have the commercial value to cover
the costs of removal.
Innovative technologies have begun to utilize more of this small woody material but the unreliability of an adequate ÒsupplyÓ has discouraged the capitalization of new or expanding businesses. This project will address the inextricable combination of these two key factors. New technologies alone will not prosper without an adequate and reliable supply. Similarly, the overabundance of woody biomass will not be reduced without the collaborative project permitting that the Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition (the NEW Forestry Coalition) has already proven to be the successful model on public lands. The ÒneedÓ, therefore, is for both the cost effective removal/utilization systems and for the collaborative permitting processes. This two-pronged approach can reduce the business risk by expanding the supply of material. This will then encourage the further local capitalization of technologies that can remove and utilize more of the material. New technologies without concurrent project design and permitting successes will be to no avail in creating fuels reduction projects and economic stability for the communities.
The existing substantial
users of woody biomass, such as AVISTA and Vaagen Bros. Lumber Inc., are the
most likely businesses to expand the amount of material used. Their business needs that can increase
their ability to utilize more material needs to be evaluated. The potential for the creation of new
businesses, such as portable chipping and electrical generation, tub grinding,
slash removal, farm chips, fire wood, etc. that utilize these materials also
needs to be analyzed and promoted within Stevens County. A survey of individuals and companies to
determine their confidence and ability to expand the utilization of woody
biomass, if the Òcost to return shortfallÓ can be resolved, needs to be
undertaken. This will include the
identification of users that may have shut down business within the recent past
because of a limited supply of biomass material. Similarly, new technological uses for the material, such as
pyrolysis, bio-fuel systems and anaerobic digestion systems need to be
identified, analyzed in our location and presented to the business community in
Stevens County.
The first part of this
project will identify the business obstacles that have and are preventing the
further utilization of this woody biomass material. The second step is to propose solutions to these problems,
be they technological innovation, subsidy re-investment, or project permitting
and contracting. The third need is
for the continued collaboration between the NEW Forestry Coalition and the CNF
in order to gain successful permitting for fuels reduction projects within the
CNF. The use of Òstewardship
contractsÓ as the means to increase the financial feasibility of the removal
of small material and to reduce the management costs of the removal of this
material will be continued. The
ongoing collaborative working relationship that has been solidified between the
CNF and the NEW Forestry Coalition in a recent Memorandum of Understanding is
the most likely method to obtain access to the woody biomass for business
utilization.
2. Project Coordinators
and Partners: The Coordinators
are Russ Vaagen and Jim Doran.
The project partners and co-applicants for this
project are Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc. and the NEW Forestry Coalition. (See
contact points on Cover Page). The
Washington State Extension Office, The Rural Technology Initiative and The
Lands Council are project partners. Project
participants and cooperators are: The Institute for WashingtonÕs Future; the Northwest
Ecosystem Alliance, the Stevens County Conservation District the Washington
State Department of Natural Resources, the Upper Columbia RC&D, and the
Colville National Forest.
3. Goals and Objectives:
A. Goal: To
identify the financial, technological or permitting obstacles that currently
prevent the removal of more small woody biomass material from the Colville
National Forest.
Objectives:
1.
To identify and survey the existing business that use a substantial amount of small
woody biomass and determine what is needed for them to increase their
utilization of this material.
2.
To identify and survey former and potential new businesses that could use a
substantial amount of biomass to determine their business needs that prevent the utilization of biomass.
3.
To identify and promote new technologies that could be introduced into the
business community of Stevens County for the removal and utilization of these
small woody materials.
4.
To draft business plans with any new or expanding businesses that could utilize
a substantial amount of these materials and assist these entities in the acquisition
of funding, engineering, or other services, for the creation or expansion of
such businesses.
B. Goal: To
continue the collaborative permitting process between the Forest Service and
the Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition. This will continue to focus on the design and permitting of
stewardship projects that address the fuel loads and fire dangers in the WUI
zone. This includes the creation
of detailed Community Wildfire Protection Plans within each WUI project which will,
in turn, enhance the National Fire Plan funding applications for Òdefensible
spaceÓ thinning on private lands.
Objectives:
1.
To create a working relationship between the CNF and the Coalition so that stewardship
contracts are permitted and implemented at a landscape scale, (10,000 to 20,000
acres).
2.
To work with the CNF in the collaborative process so that stewardship projects
are designed and implemented in a way that the value of the commercial
material removed covers the cost of the service work including the removal of
the small woody biomass.
3.
To provide the multi-party monitoring of projects as they are implemented.
4.
To conduct public outreach at each community level and educational forums that
will create public support for Forest Service fuels reduction projects.
4. Technical Approach
and Work Plan: There are three legs to this
project.
a)
The identification and survey of existing substantial users of the small woody
biomass and the creation of business plans for the expansion of those
businesses. This is parallel with
the identification, survey and business planning for potential new users,
including the introduction of emerging technologies into those business plans. This will be the responsibility of the NEW
Forestry Coalition with a close association with Russ Vaagen and with the
engagement of the appropriate contractors as needed.
b)
The determination of the practical means to access an adequate and reliable
supply of this material that will justify the start-up or expansion of
businesses that can utilize a substantial amount of this material. This includes an analysis of the Òcost
and return shortfallÓ in the physical removal of the material and where an injection
of funds, credits or subsidy will most effectively increase the rate of
removal. This will be the responsibility of Jim Doran who will also engage the
economic development community and the appropriate subcontractors as needed.
c)
The supply Òsolution phaseÓ of the project includes the innovations in
stewardship contracting that may provide the capital to cover the costs
of the removal of the biomass. Collaboration between the Forest Service
and the NEW Forestry Coalition will continue under this leg of the project as
an essential means to obtain an adequate and reliable supply of material for
business ventures to access. This
will be the responsibility of the NEW Forestry Coalition.
d)
Project administration, bookkeeping and reporting will be contracted,
potentially to the Institute for WashingtonÕs Future.
Outcomes: The most significant outcome of this
project will be the removal of substantially more biomass from the Colville
National Forest and the expansion of the utilization of this material by
existing or new businesses within Stevens County, Washington.
The
specific direct outcomes of this project are:
1) The identification of existing users and potential new
users of this material and what is needed for them to expand or start-up these
businesses.
2) The identification and promotion of potential new
technological uses for this material and a cost analysis of these uses.
3) The creation of business plans with identified
businesses that can substantially expand the utilization of small biomass.
4) The refinement of stewardship contracting so that
revenues from Forest Service Stewardship Projects will cover the costs of the
removal of the small woody biomass from the CNF of Stevens County.
5) The creation of jobs with family wages by the substantial
increase in the removal and utilization of woody biomass from within the CNF.
The
specific indirect outcomes from this project are:
1) The continuation of community collaboration between
the Colville National Forest and the NEW Forestry Coalition.
2) The increase in the permitting of Forest Service fuels
reduction projects within Stevens County and the Colville National Forest.
3) The creation of detailed Community Wildfire Protection
Plans in communities adjacent to the Forest Service WUI projects that will
enhance those communitiesÕ applications for National Fire Plan funding for the
defensible space thinning of private lands.
4) Broad community support for fuels reduction activities
upon the Colville National Forest.
5) The reduction of fuel loads and forest disease on the
Colville National Forest and an increase in forest productivity and overall
ecological health and ecosystem services within the National Forest.
5. Impact on National
Forest Lands:
a) Condition class description: The majority of the 200,000 acres of Wildland Urban
Interface within the Colville National Forest is within Condition Class
Three. A substantial yet
unspecified acreage within the remainder of the Colville National Forest is in
either Condition Class Two or Condition Class Three.
b) What is currently being done with hazardous
materials: An insignificant amount
of the small woody biomass is being disposed of in the field as slash through
prescribed fire. Some of the local
material is being removed by logging contractors who can dispose of it at one
of the two area electrical generation facilities. The vast majority of the small woody biomass is left in the
woods to decay. This has created
an untenable fuel load and fire danger upon the public and private forest
lands.
c) What would be done with the removals if this grant is
awarded: Larger scale existing
users of this material, such as AVISTA and Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc., as well
as smaller businesses such as tub grinders, chippers and removal companies, fire
wood, etc. will increase their capacity to utilize the small woody biomass
based upon the feasibility study and business plans produced through this
project. New technologies, such as
pyrolysis, bio-fuel systems and anaerobic digestion will be identified,
analyzed and promoted within the area in order to encourage the utilization of
this material for those purposes.
The cost effectiveness of the removal of the material from the woods
will be increased by the utilization of community collaboration and stewardship
projects designed to provide the funding for the removal of the biomass
from the federal forests.
d) Anticipated outcomes: Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc. will increase their consumption of
woody biomass used for the production of electricity from ninety thousand
(90,000) green tons per year to as much as two hundred thousand (200,000) tons per
year if a feasibility study and business plan indicates that an adequate and
reliable supply of material will become available. Additionally, if the AVISTA Company were given a reliable
supply of material from the CNF they would forego purchasing the three hundred
and twenty-five thousand (325,000) green tons of material per year that they
obtain from Canadian sources.
Similarly, smaller businesses that utilize small biomass material will
find less risk in their business expansion. Many new businesses, such as portable chippers and
generators, fire wood, character wood, and post and pole businesses will be
encouraged because of the availability of a consistent supply of material. The collaborative process, already
solidified through the NEW Forestry Coalition, has and will continue to allow
for the permitting of Forest Service fuels reduction projects without
appeals. This collaborative
process will reduce the overall management costs to the CNF, as well as
increase the efficiency of the permitting process itself and the financial
stability of each Forest Service project.
The result will be the creation of many new family wage jobs in the
forest and in the processing facilities in Stevens County.
e) Tangible Benefits: The reduction of fuel loads within the Colville National
Forest and the prevention of catastrophic wildfire; the increase in the
productivity of the treated forest stands; improvement of wildlife habitat and
groundwater retention; the increase of profitable businesses within the
community and tax revenues to the local jurisdictions; jobs, and, the success
of community collaboration within the Colville National Forest.
f) Intangible Benefits: A community understanding of fuel
load issues and appropriate thinning of the National Forests; a practical
explanation and application of stewardship contracting within the Colville National
Forest; and a sense of purpose and empowerment of both the Colville National
Forest staff and the NEW Forestry Coalition for future projects; a sustainable
economic base for future generations living in Stevens County.
The expectation of this
project is to create a viable business community ready, willing and able to
utilize the substantial increase of the available small woody biomass that will
be brought from the Colville National Forest because of the successful
collaborative project permitting done between the NEW Forestry Coalition and
the Colville National Forest.
Evaluation and Monitoring
The
evaluation strategy will gather and analyze qualitative and quantitative data.
This project will have three basic sources of information: project surveys, regularly
reported economic data, and the records kept by project staff, project
participants, and the control group participants.
There are six main questions before this
project:
1.
Does this project generate business capacity for the removal of a substantially larger amount of the woody
biomass from the Colville National Forest than what is now occurring?
2.
Does this project generate the business capacity to utilize substantially more
of the biomass removed from
the Colville National Forest than is now occurring?
3.
Have more family wage jobs in the woods and in the processing facilities been created
within the communities
of Stevens County because of this project?
4.
Has the ÒcollaborativeÓ permitting process resulted in more Forest Service
fuels reduction projects
being permitted and implemented during this project period?
5.
Has stewardship contracting provided the financial infusion into fuels
reduction projects that allows
for the cost effective removal of biomass from the CNF?
6.
Have more communities been able to produce detailed Community Wildfire
Protection Plans because of this
project?
These
questions will be answered with direct before and after data on each point.
Budget Justification
A. Personnel. The Director of the Coalition will spend
three-quarters time on this project. Annual salary is $60,000, three-quarters
time is $45,000. Of this $5,000 will be covered from individual donations,
leaving a federal request of $40,000 per year. This budget item will remain constant for each of the three
years of the project duration for a total project cost of $135,000. Russ Vaagen, as a project Partner will
contribute $15,000 annually of his time to this project, for a total project
value of $30,000.
B. Fringe Benefits. Fringe Benefits are 30% of personnel
costs. 30% of $45,000 is $13,500. Of this $2,500 will be covered from
individual donations. This budget item will remain constant for each of the
three years of the project duration for a total project cost of $40,500.
C. Travel. Auto is 600 miles a month at $0.40 a mile
equals $240 per month X 12 =
$2,880. The Director will spend fifteen overnights on the road for this project
per year at $125 per diem, or $1,875. The total annual travel budget is $4,755. Of this $1,500 will come from
individual donations. This budget
item will remain constant for each of the three years of the project duration
for a total project cost of $14,265.
D. Equipment - $0.00
E. Supplies are $800 per year. This budget item will remain constant for each of the three
years of the project duration for a total project cost of $2,400.
F. Contracts. The Colville Coalition will expect to contract with a professional
bookkeeper/accountant for administrative services. The market charges $50 per
hour. Annual administrative hours for
the project will be 100 hours X $50 = $5,000. For the three
year project duration the total project cost of $15,000.
G. The Coalition will contract through an open bid
process with qualified professionals, such as Don Hopps, for business planning,
economic analysis, and oversight of that segment of the project services. That fee
is figured at $65 per hour. This contractor will provide 400 hours of service
per year which equals $26,000. This budget item will remain constant for each
of the three years of the project duration for a total project cost of $78.000.
H. The Outreach and Education for these ongoing fuels
reduction projects will be performed by the WSU Extension Office and their
cooperators. The annual value of
this is $10,000 and will be contributed by WSU Extension each year for a total
project value of $30,000.
I. The Multi-Party Monitoring for the fuels reduction
projects will be coordinated by The Lands Council at an annual contributed
value of $8,000 and a total project value of $24,000.
J. The creation of the detailed layers of the Community
Wildfire Protection Plans for each Forest Service fuels reduction WUI project will
be contracted to qualified companies or individuals. The annual contributed value is $30,000 for a total project
value of $90,000.
K. Volunteer hours will equal 1,000 from board members
and participating entrepreneurs. They are valued at $20 per hour, for $20,000
for each of the three years of the project for a total value of $60,000.
L. Office
rent for the Director is $500 a month, three-quarters of its use is being
devoted to this project. $500 x 12 months x .75 is $4,500 for each of the three
years of the project for a total project value of $13,500.
M. Communications average $150 per month, three-quarters
of which will be for this project. $150 x 12 months x .75 is $1,350 for each of
the three years of this project for a total project value of $4050.
N. This project will require an average of two meeting
per month, room space valued at $35 per hour. $35 x 24 is $840 for each of the
three years of this project for a total project value of $2520.
O. Coalition Indirect is 10% of all direct costs is
$9,649 per year for each of the project three years duration for a total
project cost of $28,900.
Annual Budget
for Each of Three Years
|
Project Budget |
Unit Cost |
# of units |
Non-Federal Portion |
Federal Portion |
Total |
|
a. Personnel (director) |
$60,000 per year |
0.75 FTE |
$5,000 |
$40,000 |
$45,000 |
|
Russ Vaagen - project partner |
$15,000 per year |
|
$15,000 |
|
$15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Fringe Benefits |
|
|
$2,500 |
$11,000 |
$13,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. Travel & Mileage |
$0.40/mile & $100 per
diem |
636 per month |
$1,500 |
$3,255 |
$4,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d. Equipment |
|
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e. Supplies |
|
|
$400 |
$400 |
$800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f. Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin.
& Reports |
$50 per hour |
100 |
|
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
|
Business
Development |
$65 per hour |
400 |
$5,000 |
$21,000 |
$26,000 |
|
Outreach
& Ed. |
|
|
$10,000 |
|
$10,000 |
|
Project
Monitoring |
|
|
$8,000 |
|
$8,000 |
|
CWPPs |
|
|
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g. Other |
|
|
$31,070 |
|
$31,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Total |
|
|
$108,470 |
$80,655 |
$189,125 |
|
h. Indirect |
|
|
$10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$118,470 |
$80,655 |
$199,125 |
* NOTE: This is a one-year
budget for a three-year project; therefore simply multiply each budget or
budget column times three (one for each project year).